(18) Newton's Second LawWe start by formulating Newton's laws in a way avoiding the use of either F or m. The kilogram and the newton, units of mass and force, can then be defined. The section ends by discussing the distinction between gravitational mass and inertial mass, and the concept of force equilibrium |
Part of a high school course on astronomy, Newtonian mechanics and spaceflight
by David P. Stern, Code 695, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771
u5dps@lepvax.gsfc.nasa.gov or audavstern@erols.com
|
This lesson plan supplements: "Newon's Second Law," section #18 http://www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/stargaze/Snewt2nd.htm
"From Stargazers to Starships" home page: ....stargaze/Sintro.htm |
|
Goals: The student will learn
Starting out: (underlined statements below may be put on the blackboard, to be copied by students.) We have so far discussed Newton's laws in a general, intuitive way. We have given: --Their formal wording--3 laws
--The meaning of the 1st law
--The meaning of the 3rd law
--The meaning of mass
We could of course define force by weight, using gravity. But if we do, all our calculations will depend somehow on the constant of gravity, on g--it could be done, but we are looking for a cleaner way. We have also discussed the idea of mass, but we still need a good way of measuring it. One could use the hacksaw-blade formula--but we have not yet reached the point where that formula can be derived! (on the board) How do we measure mass? We will address these problems in the way of Ernst Mach, who lived two centuries after Newton. Here is what we will do:
(on the board) Continue with the "Stargazers" material.
Guiding questions and additional tidbits: with suggested answers.
Review:
-- How can Newton's law be formulated without bringing in either mass or force?
--What is the unit of force, and how is it defined?
--In all calculations of this lesson, we assume g = 10 meter/sec2. If your body weighs 70 kilograms--and presumably, also has 70 kilogram of mass--what is your weight in newtons?
-- The V2 rocket in World War II had a thrust of about 240,000 newtons and a mass of 12 tons or 12,000 kilograms. What was its upward acceleration at launch? (Solve on the board, though a student may do the writing and participate in the solution.)
but is wrong. Before launch, the rocket's weight is supported by the launching pad. Its weight is 12,000 g = 120,000 newton and since it does not move, an equal and opposite upward force of 120,000 newtons is exerted on it by the pad from below. At the lift-off moment, that force ceases to act on the rocket: instead, the thrust of the engine now supports the rocket's weight (and if the engine generates a thrust smaller than the weight--less than 120,000 newton--the rocket will not lift off). So that force must be subtracted from what is available to accelerate the rocket. The result is a = F/m = (240,000 - 120,000)/12000 = 10 m/s2 = 1 g
--At burn-out, the V2 has consumed 9 tons of fuel. What is its final acceleration just before that moment?
--In some weird alternate universe, weight and mass are not proportional. Two materials, astrite and barite, have the same weight per unit volume, but a volume of astrite has twice the mass of a similar volume of barite. Assuming the inhabitants play a game similar to bowling--which of the two would be a better material for bowling balls? (have a discussion).
|